Method for calibrating the tensile testing machine

Rigorous calibration is the cornerstone of any reliable mechanical testing laboratory. This article presents the calculation and verification methods applicable to tensile testing machines in accordance with international NF EN ISO, ASTM standards, and internal procedures.

1. Purpose

This document aims to verify the calculation notes from calibration body reports. It allows for the validation of calibration and the monitoring of deviation history.

An e-book is available with this presentation, complete with equations and an Excel file for calculation notes.

2. Scope

These calculations concern the following mechanical tests:

  • Tensile test

Equipment concerned — Tensile tests

  • Tensile testing machine (Force measurement)
  • Extensometer (Extension measurement)
  • Micrometer (Specimen diameter measurement)
  • Calipers (Elongation length measurement)
  • An Excel file or automatic data acquisition and calculation software

3. Verification

Verification of the tensile testing machine consists of comparing the values displayed by the machine with the reference values provided by the accredited calibration body. The verified parameters are:

  • q — Relative error of trueness (repeatability of readings)
  • b — Relative error of repeatability
  • a — Relative error of resolution
  • f₀ — Relative error at zero load

Applicable Standards

Standard Subject Classes
NF EN ISO 7500-1 Tensile Testing Machines — Verification and Calibration 0.5 / 1 / 2 / 3
ASTM E4 Standard Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines A / B
NF EN ISO 9513 Calibration of Extensometers 0.2 / 0.5 / 1 / 2
ASTM E83 Standard Practice for Verification and Classification of Extensometer Systems A to E
ASTM E2309 Standard Practices for Verification of Displacement Measuring Systems
ASTM E1012 Standard Practice for Verification of Testing Frame and Specimen Alignment
ASTM E2658 Standard Practices for Verification of Speed for Material Testing Machines

4. Explanation of Formulas

4.1 — ISO 7500 : Verification Parameters

q̄ = (1/n) × Σ[(Fi − Fref) / Fref] × 100 [mean accuracy error, %]
b = [(Fmax − Fmin) / Fref] × 100 [repeatability, %]
a = [r / (2 × Fref)] × 100 [resolution, %]
f₀ = [F₀ / Fmax_nominal] × 100 [zero load indication, %]

4.2 — ASTM E4 : Verification Parameters

E% = [(Favg − Fref) / Fref] × 100 [ASTM accuracy error, %]
R% = [(Fmax − Fmin) / Favg] × 100 [ASTM repeatability, %]

4.3 — Accuracy Classes

Parameter Class 0.5 Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
|q̄| max (%) ±0.5 ±1.0 ±2.0 ±3.0
b max (%) 0.75 1.5 3.0 4.5
a max (%) 0.25 0.5 1.0 1.5
f₀ max (%) 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.3

5. Validation by Uncertainty Calculation

In accordance with ISO/IEC 17025 and GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement), the combined uncertainty of the measured force is calculated from 5 components:

u1 = resolution / (2√3 × F) [uniform distribution]
u2 = b / (2 × 100) [repeatability, normal distribution k=2]
u3 = U_standard / (k × 100) [standard uncertainty, certificate]
u4 = drift / (√3 × 100) [inter-calibration drift, uniform distribution]
u5 = max_residual / √3 [linear regression residual, in N]

uc(F) = √(u1² + u2² + u3² + u4² + u5²) [combined uncertainty]
U(F) = 2 × uc(F) [expanded uncertainty, k=2, ~95%]

5.1 — Correction Factor C(F) = a×Steps + b — 300 kN Machine

📈 Model Deviation = 0.000868 × F + 126.3 N — R² = 0.979 ✅ — Points: 2024 model values

Paliers 30 K à 300 K (N) Écart mod. (N) 30k 60k 90k 120k 180k 240k 300k 0 100 200 300 400 152,3 178,3 204,3 230,3 282,3 334,3 386,3 Droite C(F) = 0,000868×F + 126,3 Points modèle 2024 Barres répétabilité

5.2 — Modeled EC Uncertainty: U(F) = 0.00133×F + 48.3 N

📊 📊 U(F) = 0.00133×F + 48.3 N — R² ≈ 1 ✅ — X-axis in N (30k to 300k) (R² ≈ 1) — X-axis in daN

Paliers 30 K à 300 K (N) Incertitude CE (N) 30k 60k 90k 120k 180k 240k 300k 0 100 200 300 400 y = 0,00133×F + 48,3 87,9 127,8 167,7 207,6 287,4 367,2 447,0 Droite U(F) = 0,00133×F + 48,3 Points U(F) calculés

6. Definition of Parameter Uncertainties

Component Source Distribution Formula
u1 — Resolution Machine display Uniform r / (2√3 × F)
u2 — Repeatability Calibration certificate (b%) Normal k=2 b / 2
u3 — Standard Accredited body certificate Normal k=2 U_cert / k
u4 — Drift Calibration history Uniform drift / √3
u5 — Regression Residual Regression C(F) = a×F + b Uniform max_residual / √3

7.4 — Permissible Deviations for Rm and Rp0.2% — ISO 7500-1 & ASTM E4

300 kN Machine — Ø10 mm (S₀ = 78.54 mm²) and Ø12.5 mm (S₀ = 122.72 mm²) Specimens

Standard Class Max Deviation (%) U(F) at 300 kN (N) U(Rm) Ø10 mm (MPa) U(Rm) Ø12.5 mm (MPa)
ISO 7500-1 0.5 ±0.5 % ±1,500 N ±19.1 MPa ±12.2 MPa
ISO 7500-1 1 ±1.0 % ±3,000 N ±38.2 MPa ±24.4 MPa
ISO 7500-1 2 ±2.0 % ±6,000 N ±76.4 MPa ±48.9 MPa
ASTM E4 A ±1.0 % ±3,000 N ±38.2 MPa ±24.4 MPa
ASTM E4 B ±2.0 % ±6,000 N ±76.4 MPa ±48.9 MPa

* Rp0.2% has the same permissible deviations as Rm for the same specimen diameter.

8. Calculate Your Machine's Deviations — Practical Guide

This chapter allows you to calculate the measurement uncertainties and deviations in MPa for your own tensile testing machine, following the ISO/IEC 17025 and GUM methods. Enter your data in the tables below.

8.1 — Your Machine's Data (to be filled in)

Parameter Symbol Your Value Unit Source
Max nominal force Fmax ___________ N Machine Plate
Indicator resolution r ___________ N Machine Display
Max repeatability (b) b ___________ % Calibration Certificate
Standard uncertainty (u3) u3 ___________ % Accreditation Body Certificate
Inter-calibration drift (u4) u4 ___________ % Calibration History
Specimen diameter Ø ___________ mm Micrometer Measurement
Maximum measured force Fm ___________ N Test Report
Force at 0.2% (Rp) Fp0,2% ___________ N Test Report

8.2 — Calculating the uncertainty budget u(F)

u1 = r / (2 × √3 × F) [resolution, uniform distribution]
u2 = b / (2 × 100) [repeatability, normal distribution k=2]
u3 = U_standard / (k × 100) [standard uncertainty, certificate]
u4 = drift / (√3 × 100) [drift, uniform distribution]
u5 = max_residual / √3 [regression residual, in N]

uc(F) = √(u1² + u2² + u3² + u4² + u5²)
U(F) = 2 × uc(F) [k=2, ~95%]

8.3 — Calculating deviations in MPa for Rm and Rp0.2%

S₀ = π × Ø² / 4
Rm = Fm / S₀ U(Rm) = 2 × √[ (1/S₀)² × u(F)² + (Fm/S₀²)² × u(S₀)² ]
Rp0.2% = Fp0.2% / S₀ U(Rp) = 2 × √[ (1/S₀)² × u(F)² + (Fp0.2%/S₀²)² × u(S₀)² ]

🧮 Calculate your testing machine's deviations

Interactive tool compliant with ISO 7500-1 & ASTM E4

9. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the difference between ISO 7500 and ASTM E4?
ISO 7500-1 is the European (NF EN) standard that defines 4 classes of accuracy (0.5 / 1 / 2 / 3) based on parameters q, b, a, and f₀. ASTM E4 is the American standard that defines 2 classes (A and B) based on E% and R%. Both standards are complementary and often required simultaneously in ISO/IEC 17025 accredited laboratories.
How often should a tensile testing machine be calibrated?
According to ISO/IEC 17025, the frequency is determined by the laboratory based on the drift history. In practice, annual calibration is standard. After any mechanical intervention (sensor replacement, relocation), immediate calibration is mandatory.
How to choose the required ISO 7500 class?
The class depends on the requirements of the test standard used. ISO 6892-1 (tensile testing of metals) requires a minimum Class 1 machine. ASTM A370 requires Class A (ASTM E4). For high-precision tests (aerospace, nuclear), Class 0.5 is recommended.
What is GUM uncertainty and why is it important?
The GUM (Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement) is the international reference method for quantifying uncertainty. It is mandatory for ISO/IEC 17025 accredited laboratories. Uncertainty U(F) makes it possible to know if a test result actually complies with specifications, taking into account all sources of error.